FANDOM

Hatebunny

aka Rab Townsend

Councilor Bureaucrat
  • I live in Toronto, Canada
  • I was born on August 17
  • My occupation is Media Intelligence Analyst
  • I am Male
A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Hi, HB

    There seems to be an issue with the coding for the {{Possessed}} template which ends up as this: ([[{{{1}}}|Possessed]])

      Loading editor
  • It seems like there are only a half-dozen or so of these--what is their purpose? http://dc.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Search?search=snippet&fulltext=Search&ns10=1#

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello,

    I'd like to inform you that in wake of the new "Titans" series being announced for 2018, I've went ahead and created a wiki for this series. I just have one issue.

    The url "titans.wikia.com" is used as a redirect for this wiki. Can you assist in deleting it as a redirect so I can use it for Titans Wiki? Considering that the titans are just a small part of the overarching DC universe, I think the url is more fitting at Titans wiki rather than sitting as a redirect that nobody uses for this wiki.

      Loading editor
    • I've read the thread on Tupka's wall aready. I will thank you not to spam all of the administrators' walls with your concerns when one administrator's answer doesn't satisfy you.

      We are all aware of each other's walls, and we are more or less unified in our stance.

      Suffice it to say that as an overarching DC related wiki covering other media etc - and generally, doing it well - there is no benefit to us in giving up these redirects - that is why we have them. While we currently receive little benefit from this particular one, we would, once the show comes out.

      Splinter wikis like the one you have started are detrimental to this wiki's growth, and we can't support them with that in mind.

      That's pretty much it.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi,

    I know one or two things about Lua, but not much regarding Info Boxes.

    Can you please give me more details on this transition to Lua by Wikia?

    Also, I would like to help if possible.

    You mean the "Organization Template" code now is more functional than in the format of the others, such as "Item Template"?

    Regards, Zororonoa

      Loading editor
    • View all 5 replies
    • It was just a suggestion, I apologize, I am kinda lost.

      Could you please guide me where can I check first to clean the garbage?

        Loading editor
    • Here's a thread you can read: http://dc.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:471216

      Here's another one: http://dc.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:391415

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Can you please tell me what issue this scan is from? Superman throws a small neutron star billions of light years away to another galaxy

    http://static3.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11113/111130781/3494402-7377813184-20917.jpg

      Loading editor
  • Do you guys have a way to remove the "colourist credit needed" category for black and white issues? I'm asking specifically for the updates I made to Jew Gangster.

      Loading editor
    • You can put "N/A". We used to have a thing that also categorized them as Black and White issues, and removed the red-link, but since the move to portable infoboxes, that coding's broke, and we don't know how to fix it.

      But yeah, just put N/A.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi,

    I just read your post on publication date vs. cover date. I've been adding the "Day" field to a lot of New 52 titles lately and, occasionally, have had to fix dates up with the PubMonth and PubYear fields.

    I think (believe, hope?) I've been doing this correctly and sincerely hope that my changes weren't the trigger for your message.

    Best wishes!

      Loading editor
    • I may have explained pubmonth and pubyear before, but those should only be used if the issue was delayed for some reason, and ended up published in a month more or less than 2 months from the publication date. (And due to some weird coding problem, you HAVE to use pubyear if you use pubmonth, even if it came out in the same year).

      That's just for your information. I haven't spotted you doing anything wrong (but I also haven't been checking up on you!). If you have something you want me to check on, just send me a link, and I'll have a look :)

      The forum post was just to take care of some concerns that new users hadn't caught on.

        Loading editor
    • Thanks for the reply. I've noticed that many of the 1st wave of New 52 publications don't have the day field, thereby keeping them from being categorized into a specific publication date. I went through Aquaman Volume 7 issues and have started on the Catwoman Vol 4 issues.

      This is one issue where I had to add PubMonth and PubYear: Aquaman Vol 7 19.

      I guess I just got a little nervous when I saw your message about dates and I've been doing some work in that area.

      Best wishes!

        Loading editor
    • Yes, I didn't create the weekly categorization/day field until 2014 or so, I think, and then I went back to 2000 and started working my way forward with it, so that's why more recent issues are missing the field.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Add Batwoman and Jacob Kane...

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I managed to get a hold of Charles Soule, and he finally answered regarding that entity in the final issue of his Swamp Thing run. He calls it the White, and when I asked what it is, he called it "Art, really. Creativity." Should we take this as the official word?

      Loading editor
  • Hi, Sometime back I asked you for guidelines on writing synopses. After reading through a lot of comic pages, I decided to start smaller. I've created several pages for locations and minor characters and would like to ask a favor.

    Could you look at some (not all) of the following pages and give me a critique on the writing?

    Any feedback would be welcome. If you can't, or don't wish to provide feedback, I understand.

    Thanks,

    Hank

      Loading editor
      • Smith Farm:
        • The first sentence should describe what it is. I suggest switching the line about its location with the second line about its residents. They matter more than where it is.
        • Your bit about "the smiths, better known as the Kent Family" assumes that a reader would know about whatever mysterious plot twist has caused Clark Kent to actually be Clark Smith - I only have vague knowledge about it. While it should be written in-universe, you should try to make it possible for unfamiliar readers to understand that this information was revealed to be the case after the fact - or don't mention it at all, see:
          • Does a page for a farm that is called Kent Farm because the people who live there call themselves the Kents need to be named something it was never called because their real name was a secret?
      • Keystone Saloon:
        • Again, tell us what it is, before you tell us where it is.
        • Feels well-written and descriptive, but also a bit terse, if you know what I mean.
      • Jimmy Crew:
        • Use past tense for character histories. If they're alive, you can still say "Jimmy Crew is a guy..." but from that point on, anything that he did in a comic should be written as if he DID them, and is not DOING them.
        • Phrases like "among other actions" and "among others" are unnecessary teases. You have a platform to write verbose descriptions of a character's actions on this wiki. If the information isn't important enough to include, don't mention it at all, rather than alluding to it with vague phrases. If it is important, go into as much detail as necessary to get across the character's role and development.
        • Small peeve: "Team Green Arrow" should probably just be "Team Arrow". That's been the accepted term since at least 2007, based on the page history.

      If these are coming off as aggressively critical rather than constructively critical, I don't intend them to. Overall, they're well-written descriptions, and welcome too.

      Minor characters and locations tend not to have a lot of info to write about anyway. Major characters would likely get a bit more complicated.

        Loading editor
    • Thanks for the detailed response. As for being aggressively critical, I don't consider your comments to be that. I've suffered through code reviews where people criticize you for using a "while loop" instead of a "for loop", among other things.

      This is valuable information for me, certainly better than "Your writing is horrible and you're an idiot!" :-)

      This is a new style of writing for me which is why I started with minor characters and locations. The only way I'll get better is if I get kind souls to critique it. I want to begin adding synopses but also wanted to start with small steps.

      I'll go back and make changes based on the comments I've received. I'm just going to wait a few days until I do.

      Again, many thanks.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message