FANDOM

SforHope

aka SalazarKnight

Admin
  • I live in 0°17'58.1"S 78°28'01.3"W
  • I was born on August 16
  • Bio SalazarKnight
  • [Show More]
A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • I am trying to add characters to the Swamp Thing pages but Tupka217 keeps deleting them. What should I do?

      Loading editor
  • You may or may not have noticed that I have only been making one Discussion post (the year ones) every day. I'm keeping the number of my posts/comments synchronized with the year of each post. Because of this, I have had to miss out on a lot of discussions I have wanted to take part in.

    I'll just get right to the point. Is there anything in FANDOM's Terms of Use or even our own wiki's guidelines that don't allow for a user to have multiple accounts? I've read the Terms of Use several times and I haven' seen anything.

    I know it's not allowed for vandals who just are ban evading, but what about regular users?

    I'd only use it for a few weeks. When I'm finished with my posts, I'd leave it.

      Loading editor
    • If you've read Fandom's ToU several times, you are already more up-to-date than me. As for our guidelines, I don't think there's anything about using multiple accounts.

      Honest advice, I'd say just post, man. But if it's really important to you, then by all means get yourself another account. I don't really mind. Tupka on the other hand...

        Loading editor
    • I either get another account or I'd have to ask an admin/mod to delete one of my old posts every time I wanted to make a new one.

      I'll just make another account. Like I said, I'm not ban-evading or spam-editing.

        Loading editor
    • The general practice is it's allowed as long as you don't present yourself as two different people, evade a ban, etc.

      Acceptable second accounts, for example, are bots, or if you want to be known under different names in a Star Trek and Game of Thrones community. Or you don't want anyone to know you edit that saucy schoolgirl anime wiki.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey there, I was having a chat with Tupka in the hopes of utilizing the "titans" URL for a wiki covering the upcoming TV series Titans. He didn't take issue with it, but suggested I consult the other admins. Would you have a problem with this?

      Loading editor
    • I'm going to be absolutely honest with you. I have no issue whatsoever with changing the URL. But that is mainly because I have no control over it. The two admins that can actually change it are MrBlonde267 (Chief Admin) and Jamie (Founder). They are the ones you should talk to, but a friendly warning is that they are against that, regardless of the other admins opinions.

        Loading editor
    • I'd rather just keep the discussion in one place and emphasize how right S is, you have to talk to those two.

      I'm more of a neutral opinion, like Tupka. I'm not a no, but my main hold up is there's no real benefit to us giving up the url besides out of the goodness of our hearts. If you had a strong persuasive argument to sell MrBlonde or Jamie as to why we should give it up, I think that's more a discussion.

        Loading editor
    • I kind of agree with Harold here.

        Loading editor
    • Apologies for the multiple discussions, I just figured that placing one message might not attract the other admins, as seemed to be the case with the message on Tupka's wall, so I just went for the most recently active.

      I'd have to say if anything I fail to see why removing one redirected URL from your arsenal could really disadvantage you, as you guys are plenty big and renowned. Of course, it is a matter of you guys simply being kind, so I do request this respectfully.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Should a page be created for this reference book for Bats? I own it so I'll be able to provide the content firsthand. It's a pretty lengthy book, but I'll finish it...eventually.

      Loading editor
  • Hello, I've already added the collection "Rules of Engagement" to Batman Vol 3 site and it goes to the storyline "Rules of Engagement" from Batman Confidential.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Did you see the last edit? Just wondering if the changes were accurate. They weren’t cited.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Howdy! I'm Corbin and it is a pleasure to be here.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Just wondering if you've ever come across Danny Loo in Batman material besides Brave and the Bold #75 of Brave and the Bold #137? Just seeing if he had anymore appearances.

      Loading editor
    • Nope. That was a character exclusively used by Haney; and if you've followed his B&B material, you'd know most of the stuff he uses is rather canon in his own universe. The "Haney-verse", a universe with lacking continuity and characterization issues.

      His work has been largely ignored by modern scribes, so most of that content is ancient history.

        Loading editor
    • I'm not familiar with BatB which is why I ask. I've only read the Etrigan appearances. I'm glad you mention the Haney-verse because he erroneously referred to Glanda as Jason's fiancée. He also makes Blood sound like a chauvinistic douche, his dialogue is very stodgy even for the '70s.

      However, Matt Wagner presumably refers back to #137 in Demon Vol 2 making it the encounter with Shahn-Zi canon Demon material, despite the ludicrous concept of Etrigan turning into a mongoose to battle a cobra. The 109 issue is actually pretty good though with minor gripes, but it was published while Kirby's run was still ongoing so he may have had input.

        Loading editor
    • Welp, there goes my "knowledge" of Demon lore down the drain. Although, I should've expected it.

      It's rather interesting to know that Haney's work has been referenced elsewhere outside of Batman. I guess that might be because Bats has so many other (better) stories to develop compared to Etrigan, that it was only reasonable that Demon writers would reference as much past as they could. Even the undesirable parts.

      That said, I shouldn't critisize Haney that much. After all, he was a Silver Age writer who endured until the late years of the Bronze Age, and while his early works are actually rather good (both in Batman & Titans), by the late 70s he was awfully outdated and maybe even burned. Same thing that happened to Bill Finger when he came up with Batman #147. Never let writers go on for 20 years of doing the same sh*t...

        Loading editor
    • I do stress "presume" as Wagner mentions battling a "worm" alongside a witch boy and witch queen. The only thing that comes close to this is the cobra — "worm" coming from the Germanic/old English for snake or dragon. It's an esoteric reference, but judging by Wagner's prose he's quite a smart fella.

      With only two issue of BatB, Haney has hardly butchered the Demon in any way. I would consider both to be canon. Minus the narration regarding the fiancée.

      John Byrne is still the Demon's greatest enemy.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Was there a reason why you rollback my edit?....

      Loading editor
  • In The Multiversity, members of The Gentry appear, but none of them have individual pages. Should they have their own pages? And if so, what should their universe designation be?

      Loading editor
    • Sorry for the late reply. I have no clue what's the deal with The Gentry. You should probably ask Tupka or someone else who might know.

      As for Space Ghost, a discussion was started in the talk page about keeping it or deleting it; although it was never picked upon. Should be a good time to reach a consensus.

        Loading editor
    • We still don't know their universe, and we may never know. I'm hesitant to make pages without it. We can just mention everything at the Gentry page.

        Loading editor
    • After that Space Ghost discussion, the pages were deleted and it was turned into a franchise page, in line with the licensed properties policy.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message