DC Database
Advertisement

Polyamory is not LGBTQ[]

Can anyone prove me wrong? It is perfectly possible to have polyamorous relationships formed only by heterosexual people, for example. Just because you're in a consensual relationship with more than one person doesn't make you part of the LGBTQ community if you're not in a same-sex relationship. Fábio Aquiles (talk) 22:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

LGBTQ+. Plus. IAP, where P can stand for Pan and Poly. --Tupka217 (talk) 00:17, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Polyamorous people are generally considered to be part of the queer umbrella. Ømn1 (talk) 00:24, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Just because they sleep with more than one person consensually? Fábio Aquiles (talk) 01:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Polyamory is significantly more complex than 'sleeps with more than one person consensually'.Ømn1 (talk) 01:45, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
The T and I are also considered part of the rainbow umbrella and they imply nothing of sexual orientation. --Tupka217 (talk) 07:13, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Who's saying it's just about sexual orientation? Fábio Aquiles (talk) 19:11, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Literally you. "Just because you're in a consensual relationship with more than one person doesn't make you part of the LGBTQ community if you're not in a same-sex relationship." --Tupka217 (talk) 19:14, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
I was specifically considering Coral's case, which, as far as is known, her gender identity is not in question. Fábio Aquiles (talk) 01:25, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Advertisement