DC Database
Advertisement

Suggested Move[]

I wasn't aware there was a middle Sonar. Who is it?

- Billy Arrowsmith (Talk), 08:11, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
Doom Patrol Vol 2 6. With the current creation drive of minor villains, I foresee this happening on more occassions. Like Headhunter, who should have their numbers reversed. -- Tupka217 08:21, October 8, 2010 (UTC)

Image[]

I just realized this image is the Sonar from JLA: Act of God. Check out Media:Green Lantern Act of God 001.jpg. Kyletheobald 23:07, January 16, 2012 (UTC)

Looks like. I'll search for something better. --Tupka217 08:49, January 17, 2012 (UTC)

Flashpoint[]

Why do the the Links go to Bito Wladon and not Bito Wladon II page. He is the member of Deathstroke's Pirate Crew not the first one please advise. Delboy26 (talk) 09:37, September 21, 2012 (UTC)

What links? Also, technically, "Bito Wladon II" is an impostor who showed up in one issue of JLI/E/A/whatever. --Tupka217 09:57, September 21, 2012 (UTC)

Ok in Flashpoint Vol 2 2 Sonar is listed as part of Deathstrokes Pirate crew. Which one is it? Delboy26 (talk) 10:03, September 21, 2012 (UTC).

Check with the issue. Does he have a garish outfit? Then it's Bito. Does he have cybernetic implants? Then it's III. does he have both? Then we're in trouble. --Tupka217 10:05, September 21, 2012 (UTC)

Sorry you are right it's the first one as he is wearing the outfit but it's grey and he has long black hair, but that becuase he is a prisoner. Sorry.Delboy26 (talk) 10:22, September 21, 2012 (UTC)

So why is this guy supposed to be moved to Bito Wladon II? I don't think that's right... Kyletheobald (talk) 04:06, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
No, it's not. Bito Wladon II would be that one issue impostor that appeared somewhere in JLE. --Tupka217 08:48, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
Well I'm really glad I spotted this when Rab and I were moving stuff last night then. Kyletheobald (talk) 14:50, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
This seems to come from The Flash (Volume 2) #135, where he is said to be Bito Wladon, though this may simply be an error. Certainly not enough to warrant the "possible father" thing. --Tupka217 15:34, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
Advertisement