This is all super-fascinating, and, pretty much without citation. Geez, anybody?
- Roygbiv666 04:19, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- Well, this article was a cut and paste from Wikipedia (without proper attribution). Unfortunately, that article isn't cited either. The Paradox 04:28, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Revisiting the above[]
I siggest a serious trimming. --Tupka217 14:46, November 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Easier said than done. We might end up with another listicle and nobody wants that... Also, I recently added info on the notes (and removed a bunch) and I'm wondering, should we include WF #73 as the first appearance? Either way, the note pretty much explains the issue, so no real worries there, just curious. - S.S. (talk) 05:24, May 7, 2016 (UTC)