FANDOM


  • Starting pretty soon, these books will be cancelled:


    Some of those books will be replaced with these:


    The following team change-ups are on the way:


    Some good news, some bad news, and some "Looks like they're just moving crappy writers onto crappy books in order to force cancellation."

      Loading editor
    • The one that really sucks is Sword of Sorcery. Its such a good book. I could have guessed the others would get cancelled and I'm surprised some of them lasted this long. I thought Hawkman would have been given a little longer though since he's part of the new JLA. I can't say I enjoyed his book.

        Loading editor
    • I definitely agree about Sword of Sorcery. I was really enjoying it. I'm sure that it will at least get to finish out Amethyst's first arc, though.

        Loading editor
    • Meaning: Out of the original New 52, there are (or will be) 32 left - averaging one cancellation per month.

        Loading editor
    • Its sad that the B-Levels of the DC Universe can't support a book for a year but none of the Superman or Batman family of books has gotten cancelled. Heck, there's a Batman/Superman book coming soon.

        Loading editor
    • It would be sad, but all of the bat books are good right now. Superman books - I could live without Superboy and Superman

        Loading editor
    • I think we could cut off one Batman series. I mean, we have so many: Batman, Detective Comics, Batman: the Dark Knight, Legends of the Dark Knight, and Arkham Unhinged (if you want to count that one). I see the point of having more than one Batman title, but do we really need that many? It seems like Batman's stretching a little thin with all the titles he has.

        Loading editor
    • Eh, I wasn't counting Legends or Arkham Unhinged. They don't take place in mainstream continuity.

      Right now, all four of the major Batman books are doing awesome things. (Only Detective is running the risk of drawing my ire, at the moment).

        Loading editor
    • I'm not saying one should be cancelled but there are so many in the extended Bat-family-Batman, Batman and Robin, Batman: The Dark Knight, Detective Comics, Batman Incorporated, Batwoman, Batgirl, Nightwing, Batwing, and you could even count Red Hood and the Outlaws. If you count the new Batman/Superman book, that's 11 titles or a full 1/5 of titles. I'm just disappointed the rest of the universe can't get more love. Its not that I don't like Batman but I like those obscure guys too.

        Loading editor
    • ^Agreed. I love Batman, and he's the only one I read, but that's too many titles. Batman's spreading himself too thin with all of them.

        Loading editor
    • I agree: That sucks that Sword of Sorcery is getting the axe. Such a great title with so much potential.

        Loading editor
    • I am rather sad that Hawkman, Firestorm and Team 7 are being trashed. I was rather enjoying those books.

        Loading editor
    • Batman Incorporated is ending in July with #13.

        Loading editor
    • Sigh the only Bat-book I'm actively following. I think that's more a factor of Morrison finishing his run than poor sales.

        Loading editor
    • I'll miss Ravagers. I liked it better than Teen Titans. The story also had just hit a point where it was solid and the art was good.

        Loading editor
    • In August, the axe will strike again. Dial H (#15), Legion of Super-Heroes (#23), Threshold (#8), and Demon Knights (#23) will be executed.

      (http://www.craveonline.com/comics/articles/500405-dc-cancels-dial-h-threshold-legion-of-super-heroes-and-demon-knights)

        Loading editor
    • Dial H is a very niche book, but it is interesting, and it was just starting to expand its mythology into the DCU - so that's disappointing, but understandable.

      I've never been able to get into the Legion, but from what I gather, it will be coming back as Justice Legion, or something - but Paul Levitz probably won't be writing it.

      Threshold, from what I have heard, is not so good. I never checked it out. No problem.

      Demon Knights has a cool concept, but I never picked it up. I planned to read it all at once later.

        Loading editor
    • Rather sad about Demon Knights. Bah.

        Loading editor
    • What gets me is when they cancel a title like Threshold or Sword of Sorcery - aren't these titles suppose to be Anthologies? Perhaps they should try changing the main feature and creative team before scrapping the book. It makes me feel like DC just wants (to renew) a copyright on the title and never had any intentions in providing us with quality... Don't get me wrong - I liked both of those titles. I just think that DC should explore some options before axing titles like this...

        Loading editor
    • This is unfounded. It would have been sufficient to publish a one-shot for establishing Copyright (which has been done several times in the last 10-15 years). And Threshold has no DC precedent, title-wise.

        Loading editor
    • Was this just a testing ground for Larfleeze? I mean really, why do you think they are so quick to abandon these titles? I mean, one was called "Swords of Sorcery" not "Amethyst, Princess of Gemworld." They could have put Warlord, Arak, Arion, or several other characters in the lead slot, but instead they just trashed it. Why? Also, Lucien61, which part is unfounded? My feelings or me sharing my feelings? You can talk about one-shots like Mystery in Space or whatever all you want, but I still FEEL like they never had any intentions on providing us with quality. As a fan of DC for 25 years, these are my feelings right now and they are founded in how I feel.

        Loading editor
    • Goblyn4evil wrote:

      Was this just a testing ground for Larfleeze?

      As I understand it, it was pitched as the kind of blah plot that it had, with a Larfleeze backup. I would guess the backup was a testing ground, but that they had actually thought the pitch for the main feature would work - and then it got very low sales and poor reviews. So, cancelled.

      Goblyn4evil wrote:

      I mean, one was called "Swords of Sorcery" not "Amethyst, Princess of Gemworld." They could have put Warlord, Arak, Arion, or several other characters in the lead slot, but instead they just trashed it. Why?

      While Amethyst actually had a very good story, the book's backups were not awesome. Beowulf could probably have held up for a while, but I would guess that having one C-level hero fail to make their sales threshold is proof enough that another C-level hero wouldn't do any better. And, as always, in order to keep a book going, you need to have another writer ready to make a good pitch on the book. Given that Christy Marx is one of the more talented writers DC has right now, Sword of Sorcery's failure was promotional and therefore sales failure, not a character/writing failure.

      Goblyn4evil wrote:

      which part is unfounded? ... You can talk about one-shots like Mystery in Space or whatever all you want, but I still FEEL like they never had any intentions on providing us with quality.

      Lucien's point was that it only takes a one-shot to renew rights - but so far as I know, DC was not at all in danger of losing its rights to Amethyst anyway. They wanted a book to go alongside the DC Nation Amethyst shorts, and hired the lady who created Jemm and the Holograms. Then, Christy Marx goes on to write a quality story, and did some fantastic world-building (more than anyone else has been doing, which is a shame).

      I knew pretty much as soon as it was solicited that Threshold wasn't going to work. It's not so much a case of DC making books that are doomed to fail on purpose as failing to know which books are going to succeed or fail from the get-go, and then scrapping them unceremoniously if they are lower tier books.

      If another writer comes along with a good pitch, it is typical for DC to start a new volume, and give a character another shot. See also: 7 volumes each of Aquaman and the Legion, despite many sales failures. (6 each for Supergirl and Superboy).

      So, in some respects, Larfleeze is a spin-off/second volume of Threshold, and it's entirely possible that a year from now, or later, someone will come to DC with a pitch for Amethyst that they think might get sales, and we'll have another volume of Amethyst to read.

        Loading editor
    • Thanks, Hatebunny. You make some very good points. With that said - man, those Amethyst stories really were good, weren't they...

        Loading editor
    • What was the first issue vibe to have Gates rather than kriesberg issue 4 because it is very different from the rest.

        Loading editor
    • Sterling Gates started on issue #3 of that series.

        Loading editor
    • Issue #3 was great, compared to the rest issue #4 kinda sucked.

        Loading editor
    • I would've done this on Rab's recent Batwoman blog, but it won't let me post for some reason. This probably applies too.

      Though I'm five issues or so behind, I enjoy Blackman and Williams' run, and was a tad disappointed when and how they left (editorial meddling seems like the way to go nowadays).

      And now... Marc Andreyko. It may not all be lost just yet. I loved his run on Manhunter. He's got experience with writing gay relationships, as well as awkward relationships. It's not going to be that bad.

        Loading editor
    • Manhunter was great - it sounds like writing is covered. I hope that Batwoman's art remains good as well...

        Loading editor
    • I haven't always been fond of Jeremy Haun's art. It's good, though.

      But his style's very different from the art we're used to.

        Loading editor
    • With Suicide Squad #30 being the last issue of that title, I just realized that 26 of the 52 first wave titles have now been cancelled (with 4 more announced to go within the next 2-3 months). And it´s been not even three years.

      That may be par for the course as regards frequency of cancellations. But it is a bad sign for long-time readers. The New 52 were announced by DC , as company announcements go, as the fresh new start for their core universe. The characters were built on a long-term tradition (75 years, even then), but that "fresh start" chose to ignore the history and the numbering. It was not only the backstory that was yanked away, it was a tradition of continuance that was abandoned.

      Zero isues , Villain inserts and other gimmicks notwithstanding, this new universe (when did we hear that term before?*) is 32 months old. And it is already fraying at the edges. It lacks a core. A soul, if you will.

      You see, I do not buy the revamp approach. Suicide Squad and Justice League being cases in point (surely not the only ones), the revamp´s revamps are already under way. Heavy handed editorial actions and volatile creator discussions have not contributed much to building (or re-building) a story universe readers would want to be immersed into in the long run.

      It makes me wonder.

      --Lucien61 (talk) 21:37, June 13, 2014 (UTC) ---

      • ... and weren´t most titles of that line also cancelled with their #32s? Sheer coincidence, to be sure.
        Loading editor
    • That's unfortunate, now that you point it out. But, what's the significance of the "#32" coincidence? I don't get it.

        Loading editor
    • Ancient comic book history and a slightly mis-remembered reference adding up to confusion - my bad. Please see this:

      [[1]]

      In 1989, the last 3 of the 8 NU titles were cancelled with their #32 (Starbrand had been published irregularly and got the axe as well). Four , however, were cancelled even earlier in their numbering. The Marvel NU was wrapped up with two one-shots and a 4-issue limited series till its re-introduction into the Marvel multiverse.

      Anyway, this is about DC. And frankly, I put a lot of hope in Morrison´s Multiversity title to revitalize editorial and audience interest in DC´s history.

      May I be heretic for a moment? With a grain of salt: The DC Database is perhaps contributing to my fanboy sense of alienation what with the initiation of over-detailed - and not always consistent - differentiations between Pre-Crisis, New Earth, Prime Earth, Pre-Zero-Hour and what-have-you versions of characters (and don't get me started about the Legion ...). The database is a most worthy project with a perhaps necessary approach, and I love DC books - but I cannot help but question the company's course which is being reflected in this community.

        Loading editor
    • I also think DC's course has gone pretty awful, just like their movies. I've started reading Marvel comics for the first time in fifteen years ('cuz I've been reading only DC Comics for the last 15 years) and they are much better than most of the DC Comics I've read since the New 52.

        Loading editor
    • Sad but true. While there's been books I liked in the New52, there's been very little I LOVED, even from creators I loved. And I LOVED DC for 30+ years. What little I read of Marvel is blowing away anything DC's got right now. Ugh!

        Loading editor
    • I'm going to take issue with this "the New 52 is worse than the last two decades of comics" - which comics are you thinking of?

      Series that were good in the 90s:

      • Batman.

      Series that everyone remembers as good in the 90s:

      • Vertigo titles.

      Series that were good in the 80s:

      • Batman.
      • Mature titles that turned into Vertigo and Green Arrow.

      Series that are good in the New 52:

      • Batman
      • Titles featuring characters who used to be in Vertigo titles.
      • Wonder Woman
        Loading editor
    • A lot of people seem to forget there was a lot of crap before the New 52.

        Loading editor
    • No question. But that is not exactly the issue. I still like Earth 2 (but not Worlds' Finest), wanted to re-like the Legion (that did not work out - again), enjoyed Batman Inc. which is probably why I´m putting hopes in Grayson, and have a somewhat distant curiosity about GL and GLC. The rest does not interest me, left me cold after some interesting runs, or got cancelled (Pandora was run to the ground, in my opinion). I heartily dislike most Wildstorm characters and loathe the annoying nastiness of Harley Quinn and Suicide Squad (Ostrander´s run set the bar for me).

      I am interested in DC's fictional history and world-building, and with the exception of the titles mentioned above, there is not much to like for me in the New 52. On the other hand, I may be too old for it (the 61 in my nick has some base in fact).

        Loading editor
    • I'm with Lucien (we're the old farts club) & I know there was a ton of crap pre-New52, most of it perpetrated by the same people putting out the crap now. But I put my love for the characters above individual crappy runs of books & the problem is that the charactarization for most just aren't doing it for me. Even in the current books I like, it not for the characters anymore, it's cuz of good writing & art. That being said, if DC wusses out & reverts back to pre-Crisis continuity again, I will lose my frickin' mind. I wish they would pick a game-plan & stick to it.

        Loading editor
    • Another case of Heaven and Hell. 13 titles are going to cancelled come March, four of them (Batwoman, Green Lantern: New Guardians, Green Lantern Corps, Red Lanterns) being First Wave titles. Which leaves a mere 17 of the original New 52.

      I had expected to like Earth 2: World´s End, Grayson, and Multiversity, and I was not disappointed. Convergence sounds interesting (with a heavy foreshadowing in Booster Gold: Future´s End), but the content (and indexing - hi there, Regular Contributors) of that title will be highly complicated. Maybe too much so. Juggling one multiverse proved too much for DC on at least five occasions (which is why they gave us COIE, ZH, FC, IC, 52) - juggling two or more of them will be beyond their abilities. But I may be wrong. In fact, I hope so.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message